Tips from a Recovering Schizophrenic

The instant you go schizogenesis, your face becomes an extension of another mental dimension. Let’s not get this wrong though. I don’t mean dimension like the sci fi lies in religions and movies and even pseudo science. I just mean normal dimensions such as dimensions of a software program for a virtual reality game.

So rather than your face becoming only the extension into other people’s minds as a physical thing, it becomes an extension into a fake mental reality with different rules. Mentally it takes on a completely different value that supersedes the real value in the external world to control people’s minds to a degree.

Look out for what causes your schizogenesis. For me it anything to do with the religions as well as people. That’s when my mind splits.

What I realize is that the reason that people cause my schizogenesis is because of my religious beliefs up until recently that justify that people are telepathic because religion suggests that. As I remove the original fallacy implied in religion which is “telepathic reality,” then the problem of schizogenesis when I’m around people begins to dissolve.

At the point of schizogenesis my senses are no longer just what they are. They become metaphors for something else which is not real. My brain begins to try to “express” the schizogenetic being or person that is present (according to it), but this expression is simply metaphorical rhetoric; mental metaphorical rhetoric. That means that it is a simile representation of a phenomenon that is not real. But keep in mind that before schizogenesis the mind is an expression of the brain that simulates…real things…for the most part. It’s just that in this schizogenesis it tries to represent another communicable being/s, but the best that it can do is fake that the mental faculties that we all have are capable of a mental faculty we do not have; inter-mind communication or telepathy. All religions and cults suggest telepathy. That’s what separates them from politics, culture, law, business, and science.

When we say a metaphor, it means that we are trying to say something that parallels something else in order for it to be understood. With the fabled telepathic mind trap the only thing possible is a metaphor to explain it because it does not exist in nature, and the only way that it is faked by the brains is to use the basic senses and sensations to express a fake version of it…

…which is to become schizogenetic.

That means for the brain to generate an alternate self/s mentally. This is nothing more than the original senses and sensations, but rather than these being taken at face value, they are now take as a metaphor for a fake phenomenon; telepathy and telepathic beings.

It’s the brain saying you are yourself, and you are not yourself which is a contradiction in nature, and there are no contradictions in nature. It’s a logical fallacy. You can only be yourself, and you can be a metaphorical expression for being someone else.

You can put on a Ronald Reagan mask, and then you are a metaphorical representation parallel to who that President was. That’s all that the schizophrenia is.

I always figure out illogical concepts are the source of my schizogenesis any time I begin to relapse into schizogenesis, or in other words I track down the fallacious logicality that my brain is trying to justify with its mental metaphor and rhetoric. I debunk that false belief that I had believed for a long time with the truth about that subject, and the voices fade away if not instantly vanish. I have an instant increased sense of mental depth and clarity.

The problem is though that I can’t just believe the fallacy about reality. I have to believe more truth to replace that subject, or my brain will simply continue using the false subject as the core of the way the world is including how myself is.

Think of it with a metaphor. The subject is like a holographic crystal. No, not really one of those. I’m just using a metaphor.

To place the fallacious subject into the brain informationally of course is for the brain to then “fill in the rest of the world” that you see and sense based on the rules that the crystal suggests about the self reality, the other people’s reality, and the rest of the world or universe.

When I say fill in the rest of the world, that is how the brain figures out how everything must work because of that intrinsic subject about how it does at the core of its beliefs. When it extrapolates everything from the center point of logic, that becomes the “shape” of the mind which is a mental world. It’s your own prism, and if you have a core belief in some religion that suggests telepathy is reality and other supernatural fallacies, then the mind that the brain creates is a world of exactly that.

That psychological subject is a fallacy. Telepathy anything is a fallacy. It’s a contradiction. It means that what you are and human kind is equals what you are not and what human kind is not. This is illogical, and a belief in this can cause some very impractical behavior such as the way the brain behaves when it extrapolates what the self, other people, and the universe are like in its paradigmatic expression called the mind.

Schizophrenia is an illogical behavior by the brain illogical behavior stems from illogical beliefs. Illogical beliefs to a brain again are like holographic crystals. If you change the crystal, then the “mental field” will be changed to as the brain generates a mental field based on new logic.

But if you’ve only known a logical fallacy about psychology where telepathic prayer, meditation, watchful beings and universes, infinity etc are involved, then you must have a full understanding where those fallacies come from, and what they are intended to do to people. If you do not have that understanding, then you cannot simply remove that “holographic crystal; the subject of a schizophrenic behavioral brain’s mind.”

Here’s another metaphor for you:

We’ve all seen the movies where the robber goes into a museum and has to take something of equal weight to put on the pedestal where the crystal is setting, so that the security systems do not go off.

Or here’s another one:

When you push the plunger down in a syringe, you can only do it if you are replacing the liquid with another substance such as air. If no air can replace the substance, then no liquid can exit the syringe unless you create a vacuum in space.

So this religious telepathy belief system about people and beings and the universe and whatever people have believed all of their lives can’t simply be forgotten because it is too core to the fundamentals about how self and reality works. It can only be “replaced.”

5 Likes

Sup Guru @DMAdataANDmoodanalysis… i like it…

2 Likes

Some of the stuff I didn’t understand, but I agree with a lot of it. Any ways to beat the system?

1 Like

I really admire you for being able to write out such long posts.

Amazing :smiley:

4 Likes

Q&A session. Ask away. :slight_smile: Just highlight what was not clear, and click the “quote” that pops up, and it will post it in your reply. Very easy.

I’m with you with the virtual reality and religion (which I’m not allowed to talk about). So our real self isn’t allowed to exist because it’s in another dimension? So all that we can see are metaphors of our original self?

I don’t understand a lot of what you say. Too intelligent for me.

Well…just copy and paste what you don’t understand.

First to understand something you have to understand the subject in the language. After that, your brain will automatically fill in everything about the subject with everything else beings said. It’s a very neat phenomenon.

No. Hehe.

I will clarify just a second. I have soup on the stove this sec. :slight_smile:

Good stuff man. I like reading your posts. I agree with “replacing”. Something that helps me is I challenge them by asking questions I don’t know the answer to and proving they are “me”. When that is done they fade away.

1 Like

This is going to be an epic response by @DMAdataANDmoodanalysis

3 Likes

First of all, dimension is something that is measurable about something.

So for example when you read these letters, what your brain is really doing is measuring the dimensions of the contrasting colors, and then interpreting these shapes to mean something.

If I was speaking out loud, your brain would be measuring the dimensions even yet, but the dimensions of length of pronunciations, resonance, frequency, double meanings etc would be considered.

Once that information is run through the brain, there is a mental image that arrives. That is the part where you know what I’m saying. This part too has a dimension as it can be measured.

For instance your measure of what I say is that you understand it or you do not understand it. That is the measure of the information in what your brain has said mentally.

That’s an example of what a dimension is, and to show you there is dimension to information, and there is information to the mental renditions that you experience every single second.

So when I say that the mind is a “mental dimension” of one or another measure, it simply means that the shape of what the brain is rendering…informationally…means one thing or another.

The only thing of value about the mind is…

…what it means. Otherwise there is nothing else about the mind unlike a bicycle or a lantern which do other things besides just mean something.

Our real self is just our real self. This wonky notion that there are other dimensions in space and all of that whether it’s religious or science theory or just movie and book entertainment is not applicable here. I do not believe in any of that stuff because it is not proven.

The dimension of the mind is…

…what it means.

You know your minds dimension. You sense your brain making your mind, and you can observe your mind to know what “mental dimension” it has which is what it means.

There are no other dimensions in regards to the mind other than just what it means.

A mind is a simulation.

A simulation is like something else, but it is only the representation of something else not the real thing.

So if I video an event here, the data is stored on my phone.

I then share the video online, and anyone in the world can watch the video, but…

…is it the simulation or the real thing?

A simulation of the event and the real event are two completely different things.

So when you observe something, your brain is simulating it adding colors to the shapes, sounds to the physical contacts that things, people, and mouths are making, and meaning to the sounds that mouths are making. Those meanings don’t exist outside of your mind, but the brain makes those meanings.

There’s no color to light outside of the brain. There’s no sound or meaning to anything we say outside of our brains. When our brains simulate a mental rendition of what is happening outside of our brains, they add colors and brightness. They make sounds, and the make the meanings of what is being said. The real world outside of our minds brains is very different.

So…

…there is the real world, and there is our mental world in our brain without supernatural nonsense or telepathy or what have you. Just plain, logical, facts here. Hehe :slight_smile:

The real world outside of our brains has dimensions as it can be measured such as length, duration, height, magnitude, potency composition,…

The mental world inside of our brain has dimensions as it can be measured. The dimensions are “what the mental world means.” What does the feeling mean? What does the color pattern mean? What does the word mean? Etc etc etc…

So…

…when our minds are in the “meaningful shape” or carry the “dimensions” of…

…being more than one mind such as is the case with the majority of schizophrenics…

…then that is simply the meaning of the mind. That is the dimension of the mental state.

It’s very simple.

PART II:

In a way the mental simulation of reality is a metaphor.

A metaphor is a parallel expression that is informational which describes a subject similarly but not literally.

There are always descriptive predicates to subjects in nature and language and the mind, and when this is wrong in language or the mind, then there is a logical fallacy. This contradiction does not exist in nature only in minds.

So then…

…an event in reality impresses its dimensions onto light particles and air waves.

The light and sound waves impress that information’s dimensions onto the eyes and the ear drums.

The signals from the eyes and ear drums transport another simulation of the original information from the light and air waves.

The brain’s physiological logic like a computer’s logic processes the information rendering a mental world via various mental faculties for doing so such as sight, hearing, feelings, etc etc.

That mental world is a simulation or metaphor for the information that was passed from the ear drums and eyeballs to the brain. These signals passed from those sense organs were simulations or metaphors for the information that was impressed on the light and air in waves. The information impressed on the light and air waves was a simulation or metaphor for the actual dimensions of the event that happened in external reality.

So…

…what you actually see, hear, and feel are…

…metaphors for metaphors for metaphors for metaphors, and…

…this gets even more complex than that when other people’s communication is involved and even more than that when considering them over more and more time as everyone’s memories are involved.

PART III

What you see is a metaphor for what is outside of your brain. What you hear is a metaphor for outside of your brain. Even what you feel is quite often.

Your brain "speaks,: but we don’t normally call it speech. It is “brain rhetoric.” That is what the mind is; “brain rhetoric.”

And it “speaks” metaphors about what is happening externally and internally.

PART IV

If someone tells you that there is telepathy, and when you pray or meditate or anything you think, say, see, hear, or do is in a telepathic observation with beings, people, or the universe, or even technology…

…people that are hypnotized by these lies…

…focus so much on this that they are put into a trance.

The problem for the brain is that it believes its all true, but…

…it has no telepathy organ like the sci fi fables pretend.

Computers are telepathic with wifi signals, radio signals, satellite signals so on and so forth. Energy is sent where as between humans we have to change our shape to send anything such as my fingers are moving, and in accordance with how they move, you are interpreting what I’m thinking. If I move my mouth, then people can understand what I’m thinking. If I move my hands, body etc, then these can be interpreted as well. I can change the shape of my clothes or the sign on a store, and that will send a message. Computers don’t have to change shape to send a message to other computers at least not externally they don’t.

So when the brain believes that there is telepathic religion or sci fi reality, it compensates…

…it’s realistic metaphors…

…in it’s mental metaphory called the mind or the “brain’s rhetoric”…

…as though sight, sound, touch, feelings, thoughts, actions etc were…

…all metaphors for that fable’s…

…belief system.

One day as a child the mental rhetoric of the mind means sight, sound, feelings, touch, action, etc, but then later in life they all mean something else…

…a metaphor for a fake, delusional, phenomenon called telepathy and Truman Show Universe where one is always watched inside and outside of the mind.

This new, religious metaphor for every sense and sensation in the mind has a new informational dimension or “shape” if you will understand that.

The informational status of the mind means something else.

It means that everything in the mind is and isn’t someone or something else’s mind.

This telepathic belief system is called a “schizogenetic affector.”

That means that this belief has the potential to cause a split in the mind.

Some people are mildly affected. Some people are extremely affected.

All mental matters have a chemical status effect based on the genetic nature of the brain and the information the brain mentally contains.

PART V:

The bottom line here is that in the mental meaning of the mind or informational dimension of the mind or informational status of the mental metaphor or mental simulation or brain rhetoric…

…all being the same thing…

…the schizophrenic is in such a state as to mean that what is sensed is a metaphor for what is not real.

The unreal subject is telepathic religions and such supernatural sci fi fable story subjects.

Other people can trust their 5 senses better, and those senses are metaphors for what happens in reality.

Even if their senses deceive them, their senses tell them something based on real phenomena.

The scz’s 5 senses deceive and tell them what never happens in reality which is this mental metaphor for telepathy and sci fi supernatural universes and things.

3 Likes

When I said dimension before I was eluding to the virtual reality and software programs that you brought up. I wasn’t talking about other dimensions in space. Other than that thanks for the explanation.

Logic is based on real phenomena and what that real phenomena is doing or being like.

Logic in language is first a subject and then a predicate.

The predicate describes the subject accurately.

If the predicate is not real, then it is not describing the subject, so it is illogical or a logical fallacy.

If the predicate is describing the subject, and the subject is not real, then it is a logical fallacy or illogical.

When the brain creates it’s mind, it shapes the meaning of the entire world from information about the inside and outside of itself.

If the subject that the brain believes is not real, then the description of reality that the brain renders mentally in its brain rhetoric or mental metaphory cannot possibly be real.

The world that the scz is in mentally is based on unreal phenomena, and the brain has “filled in the way the world is” based on false subjects such as telepathy and supernatural things, but…

…in other people not so much because in them their brains have not filled in the world based on false subjects so much but more real subjects than fantasy.

So what some brains say mentally is quite logical, and what other brains say mental is quite illogical, and…

…it’s the logicality that determines their actions.

The more illogical the brain’s mental expressions are, the more impractical the actions and inactions are of the human being.

Practical is an informational dimension or meaning. It means more safe or more fulfilling or both. The more of these things that something represents to the mind, the more practical it is to the mind. It has more value then.

So to do things that are of little to no value to the mind is self destruction, and that is why scz’s are handicapped.

The premise of their mental logic is not practical because it is extremely illogical, thus their actions and inactions are impractical.

Rationality has a root word: ratio.

To be rational means to have the same informational values as the values outside of the brain. If the values in the mind are the right values with the values outside of the mind, then the mind is rational.

If they are wrong, then the mind is irrational.

How reality works including how one’s own mind works is a matter of logicality, and if the brain does not get this right, then it is irrational to some degree…whether minimally or extremely depending on how wrong it is and how deeply embedded the “irrational subject/s” became during significant development phases of the brain as it was developing its physiological neural processing logic which it process information with that determines the “dimension of the mind” as it portrays the entire world, other people, and itself…

LASTLY,

If you want to ever trust your senses, then you have to be very close with logic and rationality, or they will always deceive you, and you will not do the most practical things that you can do in your life. That is to say that you may become a loser that way.

1 Like

I spent years of doing that, but now I understand that my religion was invented by people, and I understand why they did it.

I found out that the Romans invented my religion, why, and why any such groups invent any religions or any other narratives that affect populations.

That is what I replaced my fallacious subjects with, and it has made all of the difference.

For me my life is like The Republic by Plato in that I’ve gotten out of my mental chains, I’ve seen what the shadows really were on the wall, and I’ve begun to see the clear outside of the cave.

Until I could figure out what the religions really meant though, I could not unchain my mind so to speak. I required that understanding to replace my religious understanding, and there was nothing else that I could do for years and years until then not even the question games or other distractions I’ve filled my life with.

1 Like

Okay. I was afraid that you might have been thinking the fallacies were real, and that is something to worry about because it will mess people up.

I hate to say it, but fallacies can be dangerous.

We are on the same page it seems. I too learned about “religion” I do plenty of reading and studying on many subjects including religions. From what I have seen on here it’s a sensitive subject but feel free to message me anytime you want to have a conversation about such things

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.