I should distinguish between sociopropriation and socioception.
The first refers to things that are considered appropriate or inappropriate. Commonalities are another way of putting it. The logicality is untrue except only in the mind where color, voices, music, flavors, and smells are possible but not externally.
That’s what a sociopropriation is. It’s a wrong and a wrong way of being socially or in other words morally.
Socioception is the sensation that you get which tells you what your sociopropriate status is or what someone else’s is. This may come in forms rendered by the vision mental faculty, audio, and so forth. There may be no sensation that is not utilized for this purpose, and this sort of status readout may not simply be applicable to sociopropriations. It can be applicable to things that a sport player may need on the field or a worker to do a job, a musician to play a piece, a mathematician to figure out large problems, or a scientists to figure out what is the cause of what.
The mind produces a perception, and the person follows it to find out if it works or not. Then they sort out which if these works and doesn’t, follows the ones that work, disregard the ones that don’t, and continuously build an archive of rights and wrongs all of their lives.
It’s like a “computer sock” like our body is like a robot body. It is us, and it works well for us if we do not get it mixed up. I say “computer sock” because of the layer that it appears as which seems “otherly” or extramente that has confused a great many into believing it is telepathic communications from the deities, spirits, the dead, demons, aliens, technologies, other people, animals, plants, rocks…
There is a great amount of confusion about this fundamental component readout of the mind.
To say that it is less important than the body would illogical. It’s more important to the body than the body is…for the practical purposes of the self; the organism, which has to live.
So when people are mangled physically this is much different than when their extramente is disordered. They manage to circumnavigate the defeat of their bodies, but they cannot circumnavigate the defeat of their extramente.
If the extramente tells one nothing, this means a negative symptom according to psychology.
If the extramente tells ones fallacy, this means a positive symptom according to psychology.
The former will not be so fruitful of a life, but the latter will be very twisted because of this state of mind.
Imagine the state of this extramente in its physical proprioception, socioception, audioception, visioception, and so on and so forth. Imagine this “computer sock” run amok completely to the individual’s disadvantage. It is a brain, and it is trying to save itself, but is confused in its logic, so it tries to save itself by defeating itself, thus it cannot win.
Once the split or Skhizen occurs, the logic forms are of the A and B, A or B, and A not B category. Before the split and after the split the logic form is A is B as in the mind is the mind not the mind is beside the mind.
The split is something like the horse and rider concept. Self is considered the horse rider, and the extramente that portrays telepathic people is considered the horse. These two fight each other because of the logical fallacy implanted in the logic core of the computations at the heart of the neural CPU. The logic gates are not coherent with logical reality, thus they are irrational or the values don’t match up to reality.
This disproportionate arrangement of the neural formations formed of repeated fallacy in society, misperception, lack of other understanding, and repeated conditioning wind up in a chemically imbalanced arrangement which produces a false state of mind that is “irrational” in accordance with external reality or the logicality of how a brain and mind really work.
No matter what information you put through this bio-machine, out will come a simulation that is the mind in a state of being beside itself and at odds with itself…
…instead of being able to use itself.
It is not impossible to believe that there have ever been government’s militaries that devised ways to implement this sort of thing on their enemies, so that they are incapacitated and led astray from any logical advantages through the logical uses of their brains that would wind up being the talents and expertises that defeat them.
Rather than mess with the enemies weapons or their bodies by using weapons they can simply mess with the enemy’s minds just by having people in robes or ties continuously telling them what reality is not, so that people cannot find out what reality is especially the reality of their minds. They’d be taught not to trust their own 5 senses, and as the populations falls for that kind of thing that takes out the majority of the competition against their regimes.
Again it is more important to have the working abilities of a honed extramente or “computer sock” of the mind than to even have a body. Also wounds heal, but this kind of schizogenesis from fallacious suggestegens proported by propagandists including entheogenic and psychadelic substances distributed in the habitat can defeat a population from getting up.
Look how many people are confused. Look how many people are lying down in the streets now, wandering the streets rambling at the sky or people that are not there in complete filth, or isolated to their rooms or homes all because of sz.
So that’s why I say that if it is possible to defeat this part of the mind, then it can be something that would be done by the governments and militaries.
I have noticed that the more logical I become while dumping any religious and pseudo religious suggestions about a sci fi fantasy reality and mind powers…
…the more that this extramente works for me.
The more this mental “computer sock” works for me, the more experience and memories of it working I accumulate.
This accumulation is stored in memory, and it is profound how it is accessed and even subconsciously assessed before being processed into the graphical readout of this extramente perception.
It is all but startling how well it recalls what I had forgotten, and the nuances that it can recall are just astounding.
I have only begun to go this route in my life. The last time I came close to going this way in life with myself and world/self view was when I was in high school for about a year. That was the best year of my life despite being an ignorant fool in many respects, but I was new to the world. I did not know why I was right, thus why I was having such a great life that year. It was because I dropped all thoughts of any deities and telepathies, and…
…I became a type a mind.
Type a minds believe that all that one sees, hears etc are all graphical readouts of the mind, so the person that you see or even the self that you see or sense otherwise is the mind. It is the brain’s rhetoric which is a translation of what you really are and what others really are or are doing or meaning.
Type b minds believe that their vision and hearing are true external reality. They believe that their externalized perception of themselves is truly them. They are never aware of any mind being the way they perceive these things with because they are not aware of the concept of mind. They may even be “psychophobic” which means that they are afraid of talking about minds or thinking about theirs.
Type a minds are not subject to becoming a type c mind. Type b minds are subject to becoming a type c mind via the means of suggestegens aided by entheogens and psychadelics etc.
The type c mind believes that all of the mind 100% is not an internal reality like type a minds nor a half internal and half external reality like type b minds. They believe that it is all externally controlled by others whether they are of the belief that other people are telepathically transmitting their thoughts into them, or there are deities, spirits, aliens, or technologies transmitting their thoughts into them.
This belief that their mind is other beings that are telepathically extended into them means that there is no inside/outside mind theory to their world view and self view paradigm. There is no safe haven from anyone in their mind, thus it is all considered mentally external as in the inside is an external environment because to be internal means to be without the exposure to other minds etc.
The type c that tries to become a type b won’t succeed. The type c that tries to become a type a will succeed because this is logical. Type be is a logical fallacy in the form of a fallacious state of mind. To transist from one fallacious state of mind into another will fail because it was the fact that the type b mind was fallacious to begin with that allowed that mind to transist into the type c mind.
It’s almost like a trap door that one falls into informatoinally into the chamber of the type c mind mentality. The mind is only an informatoinally phenomenon by the way…with its specific ontology and subconscious logic which is physical in form.
So to be metaphorical about this…to climb back into type b only causes a relapse into type c. To climb into type a will cause no relapse, and the progresses in life will be achievable and sustainable unlike for the type c form.
The problem with that challenge is that the information to become a type c is very commonly distributed around the world, and in some places it is enforced from the time of birth.
While fallacious information about the mind phenomenon is widely available, highly suggested, and often enforced from birth in some lands…
…the information about the logic of the mind, language, and the universe at once…
…is much harder to come by.
In the past you had to become rich to access these things, and often becoming rich was the main priority not studying, but the children could study on the rich parent’s budget.
Very few people could find this Trivium or junction of three roads where the grammar, logic, and rhetoric meet within the mind phenomenon. Not even everyone that could afford to would wind up here in there studies.
But once you find it, you never forget it, and once you have used it, your mind transitions into type a without remissions.
It’s truth, and the only way that most people are going to understand these teachings is to use a metaphorical word to describe it: religion. A religion implies sci fi fables and telepathic deities, entities, and people. Without the sci fi in the religion, it would just be politics. The same is true of fallacies purported as scientifically verified information. Fallacies cannot be scientifically measured, and politics are often just tricks, but that is what a religion is, yet so many people fall for all of these, and they have done so for many, many centuries. So they will continue to do so.
But the belief in the logic of self, language, and reality is simply to know the truth, and not be fooled by our minds when our brains do as they are told which are orders based on logical fallacies. So if you find the logic in the reality, then it’s simple. The brain will do as it is told, and the mind will be…
…a type a mind.
I think this is quite a feat. I think that most people having gone this way in life would be amazed to find it at last, and they’d be astonished by what they were fooled by before like so many others.
But certainly we want not to be this type c mind.
Always ask yourself this:
What is the sociopropriation of the a telepathic world?
How about a telepathic universe with telepathic beings that are unseen yet all seeing?
Or what if the rocks and plants and all of the animals were telepathic too?
Don’t forget about technologies and aliens which many people fall into believing.
…first you start out learning about what is right and wrong to do. That is what sociopropriation is about for a child learning about how people of their society are behaving in social context, and then they climb with what they have learned by acting it out until they’ve reached the social status which is the standard in their part of society.
But now throw in telepathy and fake beings etc which can reach into the mind, and they can manipulate the mind. They see all, know all, and they can remember everything you’ve ever thought about…
…in regards to every sociopropriation you’ve ever manifested in your mind.
I think before I even take the first chip at what this kind of reality looks like by deducing its logicalities, I’ll just say that this is a very profound kind of paradigm that is real, and people do have this type of paradigm. This is the type c paradigm.
How do you begin to act to a telepathic person in another room or in another house or car? What is right or wrong to do or not to do, and why?
What if you do the “socially wrong thing?” Keep in mind that what ever happens for doing the socially wrong thing, it’s your mind that replies, retaliates, or reacts to you in any case.
Then what happens when that person or thing does that in reply to what you have done or thought or even felt or even had abstained from doing?
The logical question is, what did you do to you when you didn’t do that or you did what you did to you?
To the type c mind it is not about logic. It’s about morality which implies a social setting or social atmosphere thus the sociopropriation’s logicality in this brain’s mental rhetoric; “the fallacious mind set.”
The double bind is set. Choosing morality or sociality in any appropriateness to yourself as if you are beside yourself, thus you are “selves,” is to do the illogical thing or the logical wrong. That’s when you are got, but the type c mind believes that by doing the logical thing is doing the immoral or antisocial thing…to oneself but while never knowing it is oneself and always in the belief that they are in sociopropriations with telepathic people and beings.
That double bind is a mental knot, and for the most part it is as amazing as Pythagorean Triangle or Triplet and the same with the mathematics in computation built into the block chain system. The double bind is a kind of self locking phenomenon in nature that is purely informational, self contradicting, and completely incapacitating.
How to escape it is the right question, but that is easy. For now the question is, what is this whole mental world that the type c mind is in about? What is the logicality of sociopropriations within that self to self mind dream?
Once you get in the habit of playing to yourself with sociopropriations, and you wind up needing who or whatever it is that you are pretending to be in telepathic connection with because you are abused or you are scared of financial failure, social failure, infinite prosecution as these supernatural fables tend to elude to…
…then it becomes everything to you. Every thought can be a telepathic signal broadcast from others. Everything thought can be read by others. Every action is on a record for infinity.
And you live like this as though you are a new child learning how to act at school and at home. You want to be in favor of all of them. You may want to be famous to all of them. You may want privileges for infinity from them. And you may want to avoid the worst that they can do to you including the possibility of infinite prosecution.
Obviously you are a type b mind, or you would never begin to contemplate these things as being remotely possible, and you begin to fall into the trap door like it were a slow moving quick sand hole…
…in your mind.
The mind is information. Keep that in mind now. The form of that information is the “form of the mind.” This thing called a mind is what the brain “says.” It’s brain rhetoric, and its rhetoric is a metaphorical simulation for what the information from within ourselves and from outside of ourselves means in terms of measurements. When you understand the Trivium and Quadrivium, you will understand this much more.
These mental values form ratios. The mind is an informational ratio. Information = form. The form of something in measurement only. Your mind is the image of a block not the block itself because the form that the block is in is not transportable, but the information impressed on light particles is transportable so much so that it can fit into microscopic systems between the eyes and the vision processor.
So as the child grows up, and there are no people, then what information has the child used to form the simulation of the world with? How about in regards to how society works between school and home? These things don’t exist to this child in any mental regard like they do to you and I?
This child may easily become scared of his or her own socioception while trying to produce some kind of social influence whether a pier with advice and power or not. In fact this describes much of the history of the civilization phenomenon.
That is a schizogenetic suggestegen. If this was imagined by the child alone without help, then it is an autonomous suggestion.
Now the mind is split, and the brain begins to process the simulation of the world and self in a paradigm according to type c logic: A and B, A or B, and A not B. The A is the mind, and the B is the mind, but per the specifications of that schizogenetic suggestegen B is not A. B is another A, and this is what the child wants. In fact this is what the child needs.
For something to be as strong as the strength of a socioception mental faculty to be a basic component of a species suggests that this is akin to hunger and the sensation of procreation in that it is most relevant to how the reproductive lines have survived in the wild and/or domestic civilization.
But these sensations can be tricked such as slowly feeding someone poison or hallucinogens to make them more impressionable or molesting them.
The trick of the socioception is to feed them logical fallacies that trick them into a double bind, so that they are doing what appears to be the morally right thing, and they wind up doing the logically wrong thing, thus they are screwed up for life, for generations, or just temporarily such as if you’ve ever been tricked into trusting someone, feeling sorry for the person, and you turn out to be the loser that’s been duped.
All three of these tricks are examples of usurpation, and usurpation is very common and very widespread in the wold for a very long time and likely to persist for much longer.
And you can easily see that the inherent result is that the…
…socioception, bodioception, audioception, visioception, are all going to be drastically fallacious when someone is abiding by false logic such as the logical fallacies such as tales of telepathy, the inherent ontology of the sociopropriation that follows which is extremely ornate, complex, and long standing over years with the person, and way that the brain has to be appropriate visually, audibly, and bodily in a reality such as that.
That person is transparent. That is what type c mind is based on.
The mind will work over time full throttle up to a panicking roar trying to appropriate all of these things within its abilities to produce the predictive extramente to the point it has mentally crashed as they call it in computing, but it is called a mental breakdown in psychology.
And there is no escape this person of the type c mind knows because it is all a product of this person’s brain to begin with.
That brain compensates for a false reality by simulating such a thing.
Tactics are learned in this system, and what means what is remembered to describe and interact this false reality.
Extramente then compute predictively what it is supposed based on what the brain remembers about that environment regardless of it being logical or illogical. In fact it is computing mostly pertaining to moral right and wrong because of the suggestegens that said there are deities and thus telepathic people.
Wanting to “hear back” from the other people or beings the person believes that the extamente is them, so the wishes of this person are complete.
The person does not want them to go away or prosecute the person for eternity, so the person plays morally relative to what this fabricated reality pertains to as far as the assumed physics of it such as invisible beings and people, telepathic broadcasting beings and people, eternal prosecutions etc.
The double bind is clasped in the mind, and it is not unlockable until it has been fed Trivium like information. This is why Rx can work in some cases and never does in other cases. It’s also why social support works much more than non-social support. It’s just a matter of realization and continued input life long.
Over and over, minute by minute, day by day and year by year the cycle 1-6 is begins with double bind’s clasp components, and completes in locking. This is called a cybernetic loop.
Once you have suffered within this phenomenal state of mind, you’ll never forget how superstition can infect not simply a mind but a brain physically in its neural pathways and chemical balance.
What you think you know is what you do, and this goes for the lone child in the wilderness with no one as well as the student of sci fi fables taught as truth and logic.
What you do and why you do it are what the mind’s simulation of yourself, your reality, and your meaning in that reality in a social to moral context. Why are those telepathics doing that to you? This is an actual question that one stuck in this schizogenic double bind dwells on day by day. The answer is imperative to this brain because it is based on life and death itself or so the brain has been led to believe. To us we can see that this kind of type c brain thinks that its mind will kill itself, but to that type c mind it is a magically world of imaginary beasties; a virtual wilderness so savage and relenting with all bared out to them and no hope.
Remember that the mind is a simulation like a virtual reality and not the real reality. Even the mind’s representation of itself is virtual reality simulation not the real self. So when this is attacked, and one is in pain, the pain and the mental awareness of this damaged self is all virtual reality simulation.
Those wounds heal, but this kind of virtual wilderness does not heal. The wounds continue day and night. To say to you the peril of PTSD can only open a window the size of a key hole for you to peer into this dystopian wilderness.
What I am doing is about mapping out these informational chambers of the mind. It’s a life long ambition; one, to escape this subjective cybernetic loop, and two, to retrieve what would otherwise be a good specimen for good scientific measure. It has been a very painful experience which I know intricately. It’s not the only subject area I know intricately. I’m in the business of knowing subject areas intricately like a polymath.