…does what our brains are saying mentally with what it sees, hears, feels, remembers, thinks proximates, distinuihses in ratios etc…
…wind up being logical fallacies and metaphors…
…that override our literal interpretations of our own minds, other minds, and the rest of reality?
Can a brain say something as illogical as a mouth can say something illogical or a pair of hands can say something illogical, but only say it mentally yet…irrationally in some kind of unliteral metaphor or something?
To say something is an informational metaphor that parallels what the brain has said before the words were spoken or written, or the pain brush had stroked, or the building was carved.
So if these physical expressions are metaphorical rhetoric for what they brain said mentally which conducted the orchestration of such expressions…
…then what are the parallel metaphors that the brains are mentally expressing in them representing the way that spoken and written word represent?
Information.
Brains are information technologies; biological ones at that.
Information is shapes…
…like shapes of the letters, starts and stops in the spoken words, the time between signals such as on a telegraph wire or on the internet cables.
All space and time is what the universe is, and the time part of it is simply the shape part of it changing shapes.
This is what the brain is saying mentally, and…
…that is what was said before any word was spoken or written.
When you read new things, carefully point your brain at the subject of each sentence, and let your brain apply the rest of the words about that subject. Then you’ll realize what it says.
If the words are unfamiliar, then it’s time to get familiar, so you just highlight the word, right click with the mouse, choose to search for the word online. Get the definition of it.
For a more complex concept, you might check youtube.
That’s how you build paradise. It’s all information, but if you don’t learn these strategies, then…
…it’s not much to go on, and confusion abounds as a result.
It is important @DMAdataANDmoodanalysis, to edit or at least check means of our written paragraph by others mind. We are dealing with fault in behavior.
the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, especially the use of figures of speech and other compositional techniques.
language designed to have a persuasive or impressive effect on its audience, but often regarded as lacking in sincerity or meaningful content.
e.g. “all we have from the opposition is empty rhetoric”
figure of speech
noun
1.
an expression of language, such as simile, metaphor, or personification, by which the usual or literal meaning of a word is not employed
…after thinking about the decent challenge to my use of the word rhetoric…
…I don’t see any reason not to or why I cannot coin a term “brain rhetoric” or “brain’s rhetoric” as language is only a metaphor that parallels the shape of reality’s truth and logicality, and that is the only use I am gaining from this unfamiliar phrase.
I’ve chosen this nomenclature in order to bring others to the thought about the phenomenon that I’ve described in order to get the person passed the “mountainous ranges of enforced thinking” via “enforced language”
If words are the roads to a place in the thought of someone else that you wish to lead, then trails whether temporary or not are the words that take to people to specific points of view off of the beaten path.
If I cannot explain this in so many words, then the the arbitrary authority to decree I cannot do so logically or ethically is an impossibility too simply by virtue of the non-existent monopoly on word coinage.
I will hang tough to get the point across. Thank you.
I don’t know if there is a word for ‘expressing language’.
you are ok man, sorry it took me some time to reply, I had some things to finish first.
It sounds nonsensical.
Rhetoric means that you add unnecessary stuff to your content to influence someone. Let’s take mathematics for an example to explain what I am talking about.
The statement “∀ x ∈ ℝ: y>x” simply describes a y with a value of “infinity” more or less.
We can translate it into words and tell someone “for each x in the group of real numbers, y is bigger than x” still says exactly the same.
Now rhetoric will sound like: “for each x, that we might switch for any other variable without changing the meaning, a meaningless x. y , the greatest y in the history of ys is greater than any x.”
You see? you have added words, they didn’t change the meaning but they did influence on how you perceived x and y.
If you take some time to decipher the meaning he is actually saying some interesting stuff
Exactly that but it “mentally” says it or expresses it however word you throw at it, and so often it is simply nonsensical rhetoric. The damn thing is a rhetorician dialectic if I ever did know one from outside of one rather than being a mentally connected with such non-sense like a mental siamese twin. Hehe
