I’m curious – if discussion of simulation theory is so common these days, why do you feel it is a bad thing? If we are in a simulation and it is being discussed, isn’t it possible that discussing such a thing is a good thing?
The New York Times recently had a piece arguing that we shouldn’t try to figure out if we are in a simulation as it might “upset” the simulators. But I felt it was a shortsighted view of the topic, as it already is a common topic of discussion especially as we hit boundary conditions on the universe in physics.
Might not a discussion about the nature of a simulation also lead to discussion about a “win” condition for our universe? Better understand the purpose of things?
Our minds seem quite able to manifest our fears/desires/insecurities/fantasies.
As to your point about Christianity and Jesus being the son of God…
What if the point was that all of us were the Son of Man and the Son of God? Maybe Jesus’s message got a bit mixed up in the roughly 40 years between his death and when scholars think Mark got around to writing his version of events (which both Luke and Matthew copy passages of verbatim, so they likely came even later, and John includes Gnostic aspects that put it more likely around 200-300AD).
In particular, one passage that comes to mind is when Jesus is eating from a field on the sabbath and gets criticized. He responds that man wasn’t made for the sabbath, but the sabbath was made for man, so as the Son of Man he is king of the sabbath. The clear later interpretation of that passage was “Jesus was special so only HE was the king of the sabbath,” but was that really Jesus’s point? Aren’t we all sons of man? Doesn’t scripture cite that all of us are children of God made in His image?
A lot of people that find themselves to this forum believe or believed themselves to be Jesus come again. But what does that really end up meaning? That they are an incarnation of God as a human being? Well certainly Genesis suggests the very thing. And if we look across the pond at Eastern religions, they too suggest the very concept. Maybe literally thinking we are Jesus is going a bit overboard on the specificity, but the idea that we have divine natures isn’t that far off the mark.
If you are the child of God, does that mean if you let your fears run wild they will become palpably real for you? Maybe that’s exactly what’s happening. Maybe it’s not that you lack faith in God, but that you lack faith in yourself.
Try forgiving yourself any past transgressions. Recognize that you deserve happiness. Recognize that everyone deserves happiness (yes, even terrible people – “forgive them for they know not what they do”).
Because if you deserve happiness, and if everyone does, and you are yourself a child of a supreme being, then maybe the reality you find yourself in – not the one that we all share (which to be fair isn’t one we can simply decide to be different without working together with others) – but the terrible reality you and only you are experiencing, that your step-father doesn’t remember (or anyone remembers)…maybe that aspect of reality is something you can change.
Try it. Pick a small aspect of it. Maybe deny “them” their existence. Why would there be any being in between yourself and God? Sure, we could all probably imagine some version of reality where it’s a dystopia and we’re being controlled for some reason…but is that any more likely that a utopia where the way the world is has a greater purpose like teaching us empathy and right and wrong by way of experiencing the effects of it firsthand? Or how to control our consciousness in a world that won’t change no matter how we think it might?
From all appearances on this forum you are an intelligent and well read person. And that intelligence can be a double-edged sword when your mind escapes your control. We all know the experience of what happens when our minds create an alternate reality and makes the dots connect in such a way that the resulting picture feels as real if not more real than the one everyone else sees. But maybe you can seize back the reins by re-drawing the picture.
I found it easier to start with something insignificant to try this out, like a coin. Can you take a coin and stare at it, and force yourself to believe it is somehow connected to a sinister world? Can you then change your mind and believe that it’s the key to preventing that sinister world? Can you go back to thinking that it’s just a coin you picked up? It’s a bit of a silly exercise, but if you can do it with the coin, it should be possible to do with everything else.
Also, it became much easier to manage these ideas for myself when I accepted that I was no more or less inherently special than others. I couldn’t let go of the paranoia while still holding on to the idea that I was “chosen” or “destined” for great things, no matter how I tried to alter the parameters with the coin trick. It’s not that bad being on the whole average. In fact, I strongly suspect that the reason there’s an inflection point for Dunning-Kruger at around 75% is that it’s the ideal place to be. When you are in the very top percentile at something, it’s very isolating and lonely so your brain tries to assume more people are as skilled as you are. When you are in the bottom, you want to be better than you are.
So maybe don’t strive to be number 1 or number 2. Just aim for roughly number 1,925,000,000 (75th percentile of 7.7 billion). Given that we all tend to regress towards that mean anyways, chances are we’ll be much happier being one of many than “the one.” Including being better able to let go of a version of reality in which we are persecuted for our specialness.