Is there anyone besides me who believes they can telepathically connect with others who have the same ability? If so please explain.
1 Like
I believe in the concept of intuition as far as being able to subconsciously, rapidly process a lot of details and draw conclusions that then reach conscious awareness. Not so much a supernatural thing to me, but rather just a very impressive and fascinating psychological thing.
My brother and I grew up together in a very terrible environment and so our bond was strengthened significantly in multiple ways, so that not only do we have so much common and are very close, but I think that also our shared survival experiences gave us a very deep connection, more so than the norm. He and I can have entire āconversationsā without actually saying anything, because we just know what the other is thinking, and itās like our thought processes bounce off each other. We can wind up in stitches laughing about things without ever having to say a word. However I just see it as us being extremely close.
Interesting. I do know what you mean, I had a friend who I had that connection with as well. She is dead now. But what I meant was connecting with someone anywhere in the world.
I used to think this. I donāt anymore though. It was nice for a while, then I searched up articles on self talk and conversations in the mind. Seems like its a thing, not the psychic telepathy but people having imaginary conversations. I never was all that spiritual so in spite of it seemingly being telepathy I couldnāt fully just believe I had this gift or anything, which came up when I searched it up on the internet. Imaginary conversations kept me in my head all the time, its said introverts are always in their heads, and i have an introverted personality . So naturally after some internet searches i realized that this wasnāt mystical telepathy, but rather me being more attuned to my internal world than anything. A feature of my personality. Unsurprisingly Iām also not really a spontaneous person. 
1 Like
I thought I did this once but looking back I think it was the sz.
I think the brain is like a computer and it can be connected with yes.
Not mentioning any names here but perhaps there are other beings in existence that know how to do this, perhaps very powerful beings.
Are there people here who can do this? Probably.
behā¦ my ongoing experience suggests itā¦ but it would prove irrelevant. If it is true it would be more common than you would know and intentionally kept secret by at least 90-95% of the population. In other words, even if you prove it, youād fall on deaf ears and have your āproofā brushed under a rugā¦ from there you would know just how jaded the human species is. Just how ā ā ā ā ā ā all in all it is for people to be empowered by secrets and holding more cards in their handā¦ maintaining the upper-handā¦ very paranoid thoughts there.
Iād just go with trusting how people treat you face to face and winding the nature of your internal experience to being more normal and clean and free of ātelecrapicā interchanges by changing your focus and being more intent on focusing on what is actually going on physically and sociallyā¦ as boring as that can be I knowā¦ thoughts of telepathy get old too. What goes aroundā¦ comes around.
Itās theoretically possible, and the answer may lie in brainwave activity. Beta brainwave (13-40 Hz) is the predominant frequency when weāre fully awake and alert. However, through brainwave stimulation a person can have Alpha brainwave (7-13 Hz), Theta brainwave (4-7 Hz), Delta brainwave (0-4 Hz), and Gamma brainwave (25-100 Hz).
only if the brain can trascodeā¦ or more importantly decode the signals of others. This would have to occur through some resonant structure. Something that is sensitive to incoming waves. The a structure that takes the readings of that sensitivity a re-translates into something dechiperable by the independent node and itās built in cypherā¦ a cypher constructed though that individuals personal experience which is nearly impossible to replicate.
Like the concept of a tree is stored in a neural net of arbitrary location in my brainā¦ and on the other end you have a different arbitrary location for storing the information of the concept of a tree.
Now perhaps beyond thatā¦ how the brains responds to the exposure to a tree. The psycho-emotive effect of the tree on an individual, if it was constant, than perhaps two minds alone could percieve resonance in it. However that is not anything different than two folks looking at the same beautiful sky and one opens up itās mouth and says āAh, god, look at that sky.ā To which the other responds, āI Know.ā and they both continue staring. They are sharing in the mental experience (or qualia) of the sky.
So it becomes a blur of āreadingā individuals based on their body languageā¦ orā¦ actual subconscious telepathic suggestions and the like.
Itās a dirty game though. Even just reading peoples body language and other inflections in character and their responses to different statements. That kind of approach to human interaction only breeds anxieties and makes people paranoid about their sense of placement and privacy.
Then we hit why some of us are prone to falling into this telepathic trapā¦ we think along those lines. We try to readā¦ and because we do so in some cases successfully, we also start to feel exposed because everyone else is human as we are.
And so thenā¦ paranoia, obsession, delusion sets in. We then think itās common to be read and read fullyā¦ read down to every thoughtā¦ and that only spreads to pertain to everyone else as āthey must be in the knowā to not be concerned with the experience. They are the readers and masters and have all assimilated into a certain means of controlling their ātelepathyā and naturally developed reading of individuals through socialization. Whether some were beaten to a pulp or some gracefully had the mental control to transcend the situation for they already agreed with all common perspectives and interpretations of the human experienceā¦
The rabbit hole doesnāt get much deeper than the entire phenomenon remaining collectively undisclosed to itself because in the face of reminder, even they fall prey to exposing human weaknesses within themselvesā¦ which then exposes whatever weakness they demonstrate to each other/usā¦
So telepathy āisnāt realāā¦ but at the same time āit is realā as a denied reality where a duality was preferred in which normal human operation could be maintainedā¦ itās a reality forced on the schizos.
Weāre different, we think differently. The world likes to agree with itself by and large on many levels. Many levels we might consider āmass delusion.ā
However they are the rigid arms of society. The masses do the workā¦ the masses want to enjoy their pleasuresā¦ they are content with societal norms as they donāt stand outside them.
That is the duality I live within. Getting better at just believing the physical experience and confirmed social interchanges only!.. and itās still taking a while. (but I donāt like anti-psychotics.)
No, never crossed my mind. Maybe a little when I was psychotic, thought people could tell what I was thinking in the media and in the world around me. But this wasnāt the focus of my psychotic ideation.
Yes, this is true. However, the decoder can, potentially, be a man-made structure.
I remember the skeptics of the talk of technology that would allow devices to communicate with each other via radio frequencies and thus eliminate wires. Now, not many people are laughing at Bluetooth technology.
implanted in all of us?
Iād see the complexities of brain to brain technology very far out of sight based on just how little we know about neuroscience itselfā¦
Itās more likely(and still highly improbable) that telepathy would be something that arose naturalistic-ally.
LISTEN. Sounds like your some government PHISHER to me. Who SCAMS people who have psychokinetic talents.
I think same about telepathy but the difference is I am using my concept and other is using his concept, until I write or express my self. Itās not the same words.
It may be same when we are very close or in front.