You would prefer to have a million dollars and be eating something entirely different than what you have to eat today, but until you change your life around, and go make it happen some day in your life, you just deal with what you have means for. It’s no different with homes.
Have you ever heard of Thomas Thoreau? How about Lewis & Clark? Davy Crockett and Daniel Boone? Billy the Kid & Jesse James? All people that chose to sleep outdoors away from everyone.
I will give you this though. The higher the prices of real estate, the more homeless per capita. Where you can get a home for pebbles, you’d come around to getting one. Where you must work endlessly day in and out none stop to get one, you may come around to relieving yourself of one. True story. They aren’t mandatory neither religiously nor legally not even scientifically.
I tend to see the homeless around here sleep outdoors all arm months, and save up their dole checks, and then get a rent room in the winters at a flop house.
As long as there is food and supplies for a culture to survive, that culture’s population will multiply. The mathematics and economics of this “homeless dilemma” or what I and most homeless people would call it without you knowing any better; “homelessness parody” for all of the people dumping all of the freebies out there for them to live on on their terms while the same people cannot live on their terms while they make and earn the things they give away to them (that is how they see you)…the mathematics and economics of this niche of civilization are simply that it is economically feasible to continue to grow it.
It’s even economically beneficial for politics for this to continue to grow. Central banks too who make tons of money off of the interest on money lent to the governments throwing money around of course while they pocket a large portion of these funds themselves…
What I know about the phenomenon of civilization is this. There will always be as many homeless characters and dole check recipients living indoors on tax payer money as the market will support. More excess funds means more dole check recipients, welfare cases, and homelessness with “direct to you” life lines.
That’s the hard fact just like the fact that as long as there are people that will buy stolen things from crooks at the cheaper rates than what it costs in stores, there will always be crooks brokering stolen goods to stolen goods buyers.
In China years ago the commies said they need to kill all of the sparrows because they hurt the crops. The country of China killed the majority of sparrows, and as a result the insects destroyed the crops because the sparrows no longer were there doing their duty. The commies knew this ahead of time, and they intentionally depopulated the humans there with this and many other tactics of direct interference with the human and environmental ecosystems.
There are many examples of supply of resources causing big shifts in populations in nature not just the sparrows and insects. The rabbit population in Australia and the rodent one in China at one time were the same way.
What I’m saying is that this is more complex than you’ll lend mind to, and it’s okay if you don’t think into this all that much. It’s harmless.