John Nash - fractals

Detroit. But he’s originally from Middletown Connecticut. And mount Vernon New York. And he went to university of Connecticut. My stomping grounds kind of. He’s a local talent and I’m glad he’s doing so well in the nba :laughing:

1 Like

I feel like this is a delusion, but I hope you are doing better in other areas in life!

@daze @loke
Fun calculus

1 Like

That’s calculus? I never got to do calculus when I was studying engineering. I didn’t finish the course.

1 Like

You have a whole helluva lot going on in your mind mate.

I read this and the response you @ signed me in on… and that’s some strong over analysis for sure!

I don’t have much faith in number theory being the gateway to God or anything of that nature. It is purely coincidence to me. I do hope that the experience you are referring to isn’t a painful one.

1 Like

This is the sequence of numbers we had up there.
I got a number that can be used as a proxy for equality in the fractal of yin and yang. 0.1510471786
I noticed that time passed quickly yesterday ending with 17.36. What I’m basically doing is reflecting on the series big bang theory and string theory. I’m making assumptions and proving that what I feel is the same as I think by going with these numbers. You have to understand that it proves also that fractals and ultimately decisions is what makes someone strong. What I prove here is that my emotions are valid and coming from people who know me. Remember how scientology does things by focusing on numbers for emotions.

I want to use this EQUALITY fractal. In Einsteins theory. If I use e=mc2 and the energy of our egotistical needs are a 16306468163 then m is our fractal b 0 14 39 and c is 0.1520147602834(c) is our dedication then I expect a result similar to 17.39.
The fractal mass is 14/39*0.1
A=bc2

Equals

16306468163=(14/39*0.1)*0.003914)*0.152014760283^2
What I do is take that number on the right side and multiply on the left leaving^2 there. That gives me 33856 if I diveded this by 2 I get 16.93 or 17.13 if translated to a time on a clock. That’s pretty close I’m focusing on 16.93 and 17.13 because I want to find a new constant for equality. By now I think I have proven that I understand Einsteins theory since the numbers are that similar. The other number is 0.97345 and we had 0.15201476.

If I take this 0.97 and multiply with 0.015201476
I get 0.98866 which is a number that proves this. Notice 66 36 88 64 64 24 +9 332 66 and 36.
I’m 37 how old are you

This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.