We were having a good conversation, and I thought it was one of my better ones as far as fulling and a decent performance. That is how I value conversations.
Eventually though I noticed that I started to have more positive data in my “personality.”
What I mean by that is that I began to assume information was not simply entering through my eyes and ears. It was entering from “the other.”
It’s real embarrassing thing to say. I seriously hope nobody is prejudice. Not everyone is the same, and I’m one of them that aren’t the same except that I come to this forum for the introspection about their experiences that are related to my experiences.
My understanding of my self is that on one hand there is information, and on the other hand there is my personality. Information affects my personality.
When I am sitting with my friend, my friend observes my personality. So when he sees my personality, he has some introspection about what must be causing my personality to “perform” or “act” like it does.
What my friend is doing in his introspection to himself about “who” or “what” he is seeing happen is he is using his “theory of mind.”
So just to add a little bit more here, friends, “theory of mind” is when a person can understand that another person is thinking, and a person can do this accurately simply by “reason of deduction.”
“Deduction” is an old word that means you figured it out with out sensing it directly. Another way of describing deduction is that you have heard bits and pieces of something, and you have seen bits and pieces about something. Then with those bits and pieces through your 5 senses you “deduce” something out of that. It means “you figure it out.”
So “theory of mind” simply means that you “figure out” the fact that someone “thinks like this or that.”
And there is a test called the “Sally-Anne Task” which tests for “theory of mind” to see if a person has it or lack it.
It goes like this:
Sally and Anne are in a room.
Sally places a cookie in a box, and the Sally tells Anne that she will be back.
Sally pulls the cookie out of the box, and then puts it into the basket.
Anne comes back into the room.
Then the test asks you, “Where is Anne going to look for the cookie at first?”
This uses images to give the test, so it is not by reading or simply by talking. And anyone that sees these shapes and the descriptions knows that the cookie is in the basket, so they immediately say it is in the basket if they have no theory of mind.
If the test taker has theory of mind, this means the test taker can deduce or “figure out” what Anne is believing about that cookie. So if you have theory of mind, you can deduce that Anne will look in the box first because that is where she placed the cookie first. She does not know Sally put the cookie in the basket because she was not in the room when Sally put the cookie into the basket.
WHAT IS MY POINT ABOUT MY FRIEND AFTER ALL…
My point is that with his apt theory of mind skills he can figure out that due to my peculiar personality quirks that I am not receiving conventional information. I’m receiving what we in the schizophrenic community call “positive symptoms” which my personality is reacting to.
It’s weird I can talk to a person for a while without a problem, and then when the positive symptoms information starts to “affect my personality,” the conversation nearly always ends very shortly thereafter.
QUESTION: What are your experiences with your personality being effected by information from your positive symptoms rather than simply what you hear and see from other people talking to you?
QUESTION: And does it bother you to know this is happening to you, or do you feel like it’s okay if it happens to you?