This is a good topic because this kind of speech is very common in the world, and it goes back 40,000 years in the human species. I definitely don’t judge about what is good or bad or what is right or wrong. I just want to be able to justify what is being, and determine what is not being or not “phenomenal.”
What we are doing is emanating information to represent our thoughts. What our thoughts are are information too. You seem to like things about the cosmos, matter, energy, and time, so a phenomenon like this will prove to be very intrinsic to your entire outlook. It’s that information is a fundamental phenomenon, and more than that is is intrinsic to any mind whether human or not. It’s in all of our books movies, computer programs…
Information is always subject + predicate. The subject is the thing, object, or phenomenon, and the predicate describes what the subject is doing, what it can do, what it is being like. So the information that states, “A rocky square is a fortress,” is made of a subject and a predicate. Always pick out the subject first when reading or listening. You do this naturally when you are scanning and listening to the natural environment, and as you discern subjects from the terrain, your brain will quickly determine all of the predicatory natures about the subject/s. You do the same thing when you listen or read speech…unless you forget to, and in that case you’re mind will wonder off as the speech makes no more sense to your brain because it’s all just becoming predicatory jargon without any subjects its describing.
So the subject in that sentence is the “square.” The predicatory parts are “rocky” and "a fortress, and these are what the subject is like.
This is consistent in all information. If the info simply stated, “rocky,” and there is no subject there, it’s not information. It’s simply lines on the display in front of you. If the info stated, “square,” and there is no more there, then again it’s not information because there is no predicate about it.
Information can be true or logical. If it is, it means that the subject is a real phenomenon, the predicate is a real phenomenon, and the predicate really does describe the subject in reality.
information can be false, fallacious, or a logical fallacy. That means that the subject is unreal, and/or the predicate is unreal, and/or the subject and predicate are real, but they don’t fit together, so that the predicate is not the real description of the subject in objective nature.
There is also the matter of grammar in informationology. To be clear about what subjects and predicates we are discussing when describing this universe including ourselves, our minds, and others, then we need to be in agreement about which symbols or patterns will represent what phenomena. If we have symbols or patterns which are what letters, numbers, and words are, that mean different things to us, we can’t address the phenomenon together without confusion. We’ll be inaccurate unless the grammar is agreed on up front.
These symbols and patterns are actually correlative profiles by the way. The way that each line, curve, and angle of each letter correlates into an informationous meaning. The meaning of each letter is a sound we make with our mouths. The correlation of the sounds we make with our mouths means a word.
The correlation of the subjects and predicates we speak whether verbally or in writing, how the subjects and predicates correlate, means what we are saying.
NOW…the question is do the subjects and predicates come from objective nature, or are they imagined, and do the predicates really describe the subjects in objective nature?
So we first establish what is informationology, and how that applies to our speech information. Then we establish our grammar, and then we establish the logic of our contrived speech as in does the subject and predicate relationship we are saying really exist in objective nature or not.
If you can do all of that, you are more advanced than 90% of all humans that ever lived. If you can’t, then you will not fair well, so try to learn it. 
I hope you can.
Now we can look at your speech information below.
“I believe I’ve lived a lot of lives similar and sometimes different than this life.”
The information stating, “I’ve lived a lot of lives…” We can assume that we understand the words the same way, so we know what phenomena about the universe we are speaking to each other about. The information has the subject and predicate form, so that it is definitely information. The subject is “I,” and the predicate is, “lived a lot of lives.”
Now is the time when we do the logic vs. logical fallacy check test.
You are the subject that the word, “I,” refers to, and you are real. I can attest to that with everyone else here. 
The predicate, “lived a lot of lives,” is the concept of living and dying more than once or several times.
There is a way that many people view the universe in that everything and everyone is the phenomenon of the same thing: entirety. It’s all the entire universe, so as the universe becomes different minds and things, we all are this universe at the same time. We don’t acknowledge that very much if ever. So the universe (us and all things) constantly regenerates and dies systematically, right? This is what the allegory of multiple lives and reincarnation applies to. It’s alchemy talk for basic constructs of the universe kept in allegorical terms which is common in ancient alchemy, and it’s usually poetic in nature. It has been that way a few thousand years.
But let’s say that we’re talking about what you believe which is that you keep living and dying, and all of that information in those lives is yours. That implies some phenomena going on here such as information being communicated from when you lived to you living now.
Communication of information is a physical event. If I communicate verbally, I do so physically. That moves the air physically, and the air moves the ear drums physically. The ear drums activate pulses that physically move to the brain where the brain physically processes the mental information in the form of sounds. There are no sounds in objective nature though. It’s just air, but our brains imagine sound the way we do, and that determines where something or someone moved the air. We determine what the sound information means, or we at least try to determine what the sound information in our minds means or implies.
The same is true about visual writing, and when a paper is passed to the front of a class room, or a scroll is passed through generations by the keepers or owners, or when my mind congeals correlative information, activates pulses in such a way that moves my finger muscles on the keyboard, so the results that signals are sent to the computer to mean what you are reading now. This is all physical. Then the transmission of this post is physically sent, physically traveled to servers that physically send this post to you and others. In the form of 1’s and 0’s the information is translated or processed, and our computers render the image of these letters on our screens. The light from the display screen physically emanates, and the light physically activates our eyes. The eyes physically send information to the brain, and the brain physically processes it, and renders visual information that represents what is outside of the brain. Then our brain discerns what is subject information and what is predicate information. That draws a picture of what was implied by this letters and word grammar that was communicated to you physically.
Even information on wifi and satellites is a physical event. The information from a music track played on a stereo is a physical event. The calculator’s calculations are physical events.
The universe physically communicates the information from your experiences, thoughts, and feelings to you from lifetimes. Is that what you are implying.
If you are implying that, then you realize that your mind is information, right?
How can you discern which information is from another life, and which information is from this life? What method do you use to discern with accuracy because you must live in this condition with accuracy, right? If not, then part of your mind is here and now, and part of your mind is there and before, so you’re always living in two worlds or more so to speak…if you are correct about where your mind information emanates from.
My theory is that human beings for 40,000 years most often do not understand what their minds are, and they apply pseudo tele-communication predicate to this phenomenal subject, the mind until they can understand that the mind is information, and they can understand what information phenomenon is.
Let’s do another one below.
You said, “I’ve lived through end of times stuff too.”
“I” is the subject. “lived through end of times stuff” is the predicate. So world wide catastrophes happened in other lives, and that experience information is physically communicated to you.
Remember that if you lived in past lives, and that information is communicated to you, you imply that your mind is information, and you imply that all minds are information.
Take a book for example or a movie. It is information. The rules of information apply to it, and if it is not designed in subject + predicate form all of the way through it, then it is not information. The same is true about our minds. Our minds are no different than these books and movies in regard to the fact that we’re all information. Even this computer is informationous and subject to the rules of informationology.
But information can be true or false, logical or fallacious, and that is what information can be. If I give you a book with inaccurate information in it, is it fiction or truth? Is the information physically transferred from one location to another? What exactly was it that originally communicated the information? A mind did, and where did that mind get that false information?
The nature of minds is that they are not always accurate, and often they deceive with inaccurate information too. This is true now, and this was true thousands of years ago especially when fewer facts were known about anything.
So we would expect that like when we examine a book or a movie or logicality or fallacy, we can do the same with our minds as well. I can do this with what you say, but only you can do this internally because you are the only one with contact with your mind, so only you can examine your own mind this way checking each subject and each predicate for all of your life. What if you did that for all of your lifetime up to today? Would you be a very different person?
So if a book can be of fallacy, and a movie and a mind can be too, then what exactly are we up to? What’s going on here…in the moment of this discussion as we read and write to each other? We’re attempting to examine the informationous content of each other’s minds. I like that because I like mindology. I like information…lots and lots of it.
But just because the words correlate into subject and predicate information on a book page, or the pictures and sounds correlate into subject and predicate information on a movie screen doesn’t mean that this information is logical. This is extremely important to know in this universe because if you don’t, then you can easily be tricked. Your brain can even trick itself, and I’m not kidding. Most people don’t realize what they are mentally until it’s too late. But keep in mind it’s not too late for you or anyone else here.
What you did was you examined the information of your mind, and you labeled it as having predicatory nature which is being from “other live times.” It’s “mind info” + “other life times.” That’s the subject + predicate form you use to describe your mind.
Does that make it true? Or can information be false as well as true?
Let’s do another one below.
You said, “I had my mind uploaded to a computer by aliens in a past life among other stuff.”
The subject and predicate we’re concerned with here is “mind” and “uploaded to a computer.”
So you acknowledge here directly that the mind is information whether you understand what information is or not, right? And communication of information requires a physical exchange of sorts, a transaction, right?
The subject, “mind” is a real phenomenon, but what about the “uploaded to a computer,” predicate?
If someone hands me a book that was written today, I can’t automatically determine if that was written on a computer, and uploaded to another computer at some time. It could be a different process involved between writing and printing it, correct? If I pulled a movie real out of an archive somewhere, this could be true too, correct? I can’t tell if it was ever information that was uploaded to a computer or not just by look at it, right?
So the question here is how do you discern what information in your mind is previously uploaded to anything, and what information in your mind was never uploaded to anything in this lifetime? What methodology do you use to be sure you are living accurately here and now because that must be a high priority in your life.
You said, “I believe I was given schizophrenia. In my past lives, I did time travel. I think it caused schizophrenia like symptoms.”
So you, the subject concept, was given sz in a past life doing time travel, is the predicate about you. Or in other words time travel in another life caused sz.
Your mind is information whether or not it is sz, normie, depressive, dementia, manic, phobic, paranoid, etc. The only question about it is whether that information is logical when we examine it with the subject + predicate method. We have to check each subject and each of their predicates in our minds for whether they are real phenomenons found in objective nature, and then to see if they fit together or not.
But you go even further. You suggest that information can be physically communicated from other lives that lived in other time, and this transference from one life time to another made your information sz which is simply saying that the information that is your mind became fallacious because of the physical transference of that mental information.
So we would have to ask a few more things.
What information transponder mechanism transmits the information from experiences in other life times into your mind here and now? Where is this mechanism located?
One what physical phenomenon is the information borne on? For example the information is borne on electrical pulses from my computer to servers, and from servers to your computer. The movement of an object impresses information that represents that movement onto both air and light, and it’s borne on the air and light before it interacts with our eyeballs and ear drums. The writer of a letter uses ink and wood pulp to transfer the information.
What phenomenon is your previous life time experience information borne on in the physical procession of transferal?
This mind seem lengthy, but it could be the most important information you’ll ever get a chance to read.
