This is a very rude post. I don’t see anything that leads me to believe your disproving anything other than you want to centralize the use of language and information to suit your purposes, and you are disguising that in the old classic “for the better good of everyone else” fallacy.
That fallacy doesn’t apply here to me or anyone else in the world. “for the better good of everyone” doesn’t disprove anything, and it certainly doesn’t disprove that you are trying to centralize the agency of thought and information exchange.
I don’t trust moderators of websites especially psych forums for the ill who call the guests, “dude.” It’s rude. Dude is a derogatory word, and you can look that up for the definition.
Who is “we?” This is my thread, and you have hijacked it. I have opened a dialogue with the other admins about this and other problems such as stalking, emotive behavior as an admin to myself and other guests which I will continue to do as I find you doing this to anyone.
You did not interpret the use of the word, language, when/if you cared to read my post, and you are reading my posts with a negative bias, so you inherently see error because that’s what you want to see which is very unbecoming of an admin. Other admins have no problems with me. Only you do.
This is the post you’re referring to:
DMAdataANDmoodanalysis4h
Maybe I can help. A lot of people have a problem with reading not just sz’s, and I know I’ve been there.
In each sentence just pin down the subject of the sentence. Then the rest of the sentence should be the predicate that describes the subject.
That’s how logic is in language and in nature. Our brains automatically begin describing the subjects that it pins down in our surroundings, so you just have to get in the practice of pin pointing the subject in language, and let your brain describe it with the remainder of the sentence.
At first it is kind of “manual” and not very speedy, but with practice both when you hear and read language and maybe when you are watching and listening to scenery…eventually it flows very easily and automatically.
I told the guest who said mentioned trouble with reading how to be more careful when reading because no one teaches anyone how to read here nor anywhere else. I am teaching not being a thorn in the side, nor am I hurting anyone, so I don’t see any reason for the admin to interject and object to my use of the forum, my thoughts, or words.
Again, “we’re” are going to use logic and fallacy to read and to think accurately about what we read, hear, our thoughts, and voices.
Everything in my post that I quoted which you have said was wrong is logically accurate, and you didn’t even take the time to cite the fallacy in it.
You said the logic isn’t the problem, but yes, it is. Prove that it isn’t. The logic is the problem, and until it is understood, then it can’t be used to the benefit of the guests or anyone else in the world. It’s a universal problem, and it’s a universal tool for reading, thinking, writing, analyzing, developing, introspective self analysis…
Then you digress into the use of the word, postersaurus, and you obviously got it wrong by taking it as an antisocial word. I was referring to the size of my posts as in they are big.
And a lot of words in a post a bad post nor a guest do they make.