Would you marry for money if it meant you could never be happy?
3 Likes
Nope. I wouldn’t.
2 Likes
No; I wouldn’t; if it meant no happiness.
1 Like
No. I’m too much of a romantic at heart, and it would be sheer misery
Hell no. I’m happy even without money. You don’t need money to be happy. You just need a nice comfortable bed and some peace of mind.
2 Likes
Is happiness just chemicals flowing through your brain or something more?
I would. Im not guaranteed to be happy otherwise.
Nah I can make money other ways. Hopefully 
. Doesn’t make sense to marry for money if not happy. When happiness is the purpose of life.
I’m unhappy anyways, might as well have the money to go with it.
2 Likes
Nope never ever
Would you always be unhappy?
If so, it would t be worth it
No way. For me I’d rather be happy
Being happy is greater than having money.
Nope, doubt I would ever marry again for any reason
I think reducing something as complex as emotions down to simple chemical responses, it’s just excessive reductionism.
The emotional response triggers the release of endorphins, not the other way around in my opinion
An example would be a friend of mine who comes from a social work background, claiming that anger is a neurochemical issue.
But as I have pointed out to him on multiple occasions, I grew up in a violent environment with an angry father, and angry brother and fighting for my life everyday. That is what caused the anger issue, not some arbitrary chemical mix
i am not that person
we all imagine ourselves as good ppl
but sometime ppl hv flawed view about what is good and what is bad
but we all think we are good ppl whatsoever
for me i dont marry for money
although i love money
c est la vie
No. Never. I don’t want to be rich. I want to be happy. I have the money I need to live a normal life. So I don’t need more.
Yes! Exactly. It is better to be happy than to be wealthy.
1 Like
This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.