"Medical marijuana laws differ by state, but medical marijuana is not approved by the FDA to treat any medical condition. As a result, state approval has been based on ‘low-quality scientific evidence, anecdotal reports, individual testimonials, legislative initiatives, and public opinion,’ wrote Deepak Cyril D’Souza, MBBS, MD, and Mohini Ranganathan, MBBS, of Yale University, in an accompanying editorial. 'Imagine if other drugs were approved through a similar approach.'
"Whiting’s group searched for randomized, controlled trials testing cannabis, or cannabinoid-based medications, across 28 databases through April 2015 and settled on 79 trials with 6,462 participants for this meta-analysis.
"A few trials had patients with Tourette syndrome, glaucoma, sleep disorders, psychosis, depression or anxiety, but none of them provided reliable research, the authors noted.
“Whiting’s group determined that only 5% had a low risk of bias, and 70% were considered high risk. Some of this bias was due to lack of double-blinding and placebo controls.”
I, however, am not taking the position that THC or cannabinol are ineffective for everyone who take them for whatever specific maladies they have. I will suggest, however, that those who believe in marijuana tend to be those who have ingested it for a long time.
Comments?
See the entire article at…