The problem is that the vast majority of addicts recover without treatment, so it’s actually probably counterproductive to make it seem like treatment is the solution.
What I’m saying is that the idea that addicts don’t recover without treatment is a myth. Most addicts who recover do so without treatment. That is not to say that treatment isn’t useful for most or necessary for many.
Why are you angry with me?
These are not random opinions that I just came up with to discredit your experiences.
The fact that most people who recover from addiction do so without treatment is a cause for hope. It is also a good reason to caution against thinking of addiction as something we can never control or take personal responsibility for. It is not an insult directed at you for needing treatment, or an argument against treatment.
That many do well without treatment does not mean you were just too irresponsible to quit on your own. It just means that the idea that we can’t quit without treatment is a potentially harmful myth.
I’d prefer a discussion grounded in reality as opposed to one that just makes us feel better about ourselves. A serious problem deserves a candid discussion.
No one is saying this. I’ve been through years of addiction treatment, myself.
I’ve heard it described as a learning disability. I got this from one book called “Unbroken Brain.” In it, the author takes issue with calling it “abuse” at all. And also says that hitting rock bottom is not necessarily a good thing, bc people are more likely to recover when they are working and surrounded by people. I.E Connection.
No, you are making yourself feel that way. No one is saying this. I’ve taken a lot of care not to imply this. Other people’s successes do not make you a failure. What works for some people does not necessarily work for you.