This time audio.
I would take it by I know my score would be rubbish!
I try and look it in a ‘Can I do better than I did before?’ way, irrespective of whether it’s better or worse than someone else.
It’s best done on a laptop or tablet(?). Times can be ridiculously bad using a smartphone to do it.
Not sure if I should bother. These things keep accusing me of being a robot. The problem is they’re not random so I’m able to anticipate when to hit the keyboard.
I can see how that would queer the pitch re accurately judging how good or bad you are at such things. You’re by no means the only person to do that kind of thing. A different thing but I’ve heard of maths experts using letter frequency to do better at the NY times wordle . With something like the human benchmark reaction test <100 ms is about anticipation rather than speed of reaction.
What matters more is the standard deviation in reaction time . Technically a 40 year old should be quicker than me, for example . With being quicker likely to result in a lower standard deviation.
Not so much that. Just found with any type of test I am getting poor results :-/
As they say in football- ’ ‘Form is temporary, class is permanent ‘. You’re one of the smart guys.
Thanks @firemonkey
My mother says I must accept from my manager at work that I am doing the right things
Apparently it will be irritating to other people if you don’t accept those kinds of statements.
I just have trouble with thinking positively as I don’t want to slip into a grandiose arrogance about this that and the other
The motivation I have comes from a bad place, and that’s something that needs to be fixed ASAP
But we’re all a work in progress
This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.