In my own views I am coming from many years of trying to quantify what is the “mind” or “spirit” or what I simply call the personality which is a term that may differ from what you understand about that word. I am much less interested in the physical matter and its physical mechanics than I am about the “holographic personality” itself.
What is it? That’s the question, and I want to understand what is civilization front to back top to bottom, side to side before I can understand what that phenomenon just is. It’s that phenomenon which is universally present throughout civilization no matter when or where you are talking about. It is all, and it is you. It’s very important, and it is no wonder why it has been the subject of discourse for many thousands of years long before even writing an ordinary word was done. They had called it a spirit or soul for ages until recently except in some lands, and I call it personality. If it is of personality, it is personalitous. If it is of spirit, then it is spiritual. If it is of mind or “mental” then is psychological. All of these terms and concepts refer to the exact same phenomenon.
So in the process of years of defining the personality phenomenon in other people thus in myself easier, and thus once easier in myself, easier in other people, I have learned to isolate each value represented in each sensation that I can possibly experience. I isolate each possible type of sensation.
So in my soul I would have a grid with all of the possible sensations listed across the top of the grid table, and then I would have all of the possible values represented down the side. Each value along the side creates a different sensation in each column of sensation category.
So a sensation would be a memory, a new idea, vision, hearing, vocational proximity to self and other things, hunger, frustration, happy, sad, astonished, understanding…
Then each value would be such a thing as a sun, a bird, a rock, a number, an algebraic function, letters, a sentence, a clothing article and so on…
So each value along the side plugs up into each sensation along the top, and viola!!! You experience the exact quanta of qualia. That is fancy talk for “unit of personality phenomenon.”
So exactly how many are there? There are an finite amount. Yes, they actually just repeat themselves over and over and over, so it’s actually fairly simple.
The only qualia that does not repeat itself over and over and over is the #1 qualia. It is understanding. That’s understanding of knowledge. Be careful though because false information can create false logic, and then you will make a life time full of mistake because “no rationality.” No logical judgement. Without that how can you correctly navigate this superstructure we live in we frankly refer to as just “life?” It is not a problem that is exclusive to scz’s. It is a problem exclusive to life itself. Even computers fall to this conundrum. It is the nature of nature which is something they’ve been calling God, Tao, and the Universe. It’s all the same thing, but just remember that allegory was necessary in ancient days because tyrant rulers and their mobs would kill ya for teaching people exacting knowledge freely, thus the allegorical form of the wisdom.
So I’ve quantified all of the inner qualia of the personality phenomenon, and measured extensively the natural characteristics both assets and deficits of all kinds of cultures and behaviors enough over the years that I can easily envision these categories and combinations within myself and within others.
And it is no problem for me to see that there is a “split personality” state of this phenomenon in that “lego set” so to speak where simply the meaning of the sensation has been changed as if to change the meaning of several words such as in slang languages. Yes, the meaning of the sensations were changed in belief, and then practiced as believing in that they were not of oneself but of some kind of other being of any sorts. The scz’s are in the belief that we are in some communication with “other beings” in magical ways, and the type of being varies from scz to scz, but in all cases there are magical communicating beings. It is simply that the sensations of the personality phenomenon have been re-programmed to mean “of other beings,” and therefore this has changed the dynamics of the entire world and universe paradigm.
If I were teaching all of you in kindergarten about mind communication with other beings and technologies, then the whole view of your world would be completely different for as long as you believed it were true. Different because every sensation you experience within your personal personality is not a unique sensation of your own, but is a sensation mutually experienced throughout the world, community, universe, networks or whatever the class teacher told you to believe.
If mutual sensation were the case, and we were one big hive mind which is what the scz essentially experiences paradigmatically, then after that all things that one does or doesn’t do takes on a whole new meaning. And since all things take on a whole new meaning, what it is that your personality achieves and does not achieve the rest of your life fixed to an alternate code of laws.
It is my understanding that this works on many people already without a class on it but serendipitously, but this “re-programming” of the sensations is not unique to only the scz’s.
That’s right. The entire civilization “re-programs” their sensations from the time they are born. In fact the ability to walk, talk, and use your arms is begun reprogramming straight away when you are born. An example is the language, accent, and particular dialect that you learn which is solidly ingrained in you for life. Another example is the level of math, computer science, natural science, philosophy, athletics, musicianship, leadership, team work, sociability and so on and so on…these too are effectively the “re-programming” of the sensations.
Yes, through training you can understand what I write when I write “The Can.” You’re sensations are trained so that when those 6 letters interact with your personality, the sensation is the experience you have in which you see and understand what that is which is written on the page. Most personalities of the world however cannot experience that same experience because their sensations are not trained to do so with that particular information. I would need to restructure the lines in the letters, so that they would experience the same understanding as you had when you read those 2 words.
So when you learnt that those voices and sensations are not of you but “of others,” then whenever you have sensations which routinely occur in any personality just so ordinarily, the experience is different than in other people. You experience “others” which are not there while most people would simply have experienced themselves.
Most people experience personalitous sensations, and they view this as simply looking into themselves like looking into a well of personalitous sensations including creativity and all of the others in combination with so many values too, and they simply see in there like it were a big atmospheric dome where there are many species of different characteristics both sensational type and value type appearing and vanishing, living in harmony as well as contentiously sometimes. They never experience that any of it in there is communicative nor mutually experienced with anyone or thing. They are alone, and all of it is simply of themselves.
Whereas the scz looks into that dome of personality within themselves, and they believe there is communication going on between the sensations which are exchanging values the way that human beings do in real life. There is a give and take between the sensations. If such and such is experienced or understood, then there is a reaction in accord to that, and then there is a reaction in accord to that too, and this perpetual, theatrical show goes on and on and on for years unceasingly.
You see what is that phenomenon inside of you is your personality. Even the color of what you see and the music in what you hear is of your personality or is personalitous. Those are a few of your sensations which react to information according to the values of that information. It’s very simple, and it is very fallacious that sensations are interacting sociologically, but it must be one componential function of nature’s logic, or it would not be possible.
Split Personality or Split Mind or Split Soul