If I can I just say it point blank without a hint of shame, doubt, or what have you, not even as though I am making light of things but without implying a burden. They end up thinking I have a sense of humor and that things aren’t that bad. Yesterday I went literally: “Periodically I have hallucinations and delusions, a couple weeks ago I was hearing birds speaking while chirping” as though I was telling them that I have to take a sh*t every now and then and I took a big one a couple weeks prior.
Sometimes I make it a curiosity and try to explain the delusion side of things passing by the altered realization that accompanies them, explaining as though it were like the difference between watching the same movie with and without soundtrack, with all the emotional music twisting your outlook on things. People get that hey, it’s not that alien I would also react weirdly if I had suspense music embedded in reality or something along those lines.
It’s about making it appear understandable or making it appear as something that isn’t going to affect them. I don’t need to hide anything. If you feel the need to hide things when you say the truth or a lie, you aren’t taking control of the narrative. People perceive your vulnerability and end up rationalizing it by projecting things onto it as best they can. If you give them channels through which to relate or don’t put them in the condition of feeling compelled to show empathy or sympathy, they’ll be happy to not drag things down.
It is different when I expect people to perceive me as vulnerable or want to be acknowledged for my difficulties, especially with people with prior interactions with psychotic people, then I either downplay or misdirect visibly, so that the person feels like I’m trying to cope and this plays out as though I’m asking them not to be burdened further with worry and sympathy in a way that allows them to comply with my request.
It is the worst when I have to deal with people who expect me to be vulnerable in general without any understanding of my condition and of how it affects me personally, then they end up projecting sympathy before I get the chance to set the bar and keep looking for something for their sympathy to latch onto and if they don’t find it they grow displeased and doubtful, because at that point my subconscious takes over and starts making up all sorts of emotions to bend my behaviour to their expectations, leading to anxiety and fear which then makes me anger prone in order to overwhelm their disgusting approach and reassert my own truth, because I am tired of being cornered into all sorts of BS just because they think that sympathy is a jolly and something that is acceptable to lead with. It isn’t.
People who lead with sympathy or use sympathy proactively are misguided, sympathy should always be reactive from an emotional and not a simple cognitive prompt, because proactive use of sympathy has only a proper response, which is anger or at the very least irritation, and the setting almost always doesn’t allow for it or lets it lead to misunderstandings because people who do this don’t have the awareness that maybe our anger is justified and their sympathy disgusting. The fact that you perceive sympathy and don’t react with anger leads to a spike in anxiety which then justifies the sympathy. It is a sickening process which validates their misguided behaviour, but there really aren’t any ways to deal with it other than soldiering through the anxiety and anger with as much composure as we can muster.