I have been discussing on another forum on music, about the link between creativity and mental health.
The musician Buddy Benson, had schizophrenia, and psychiatists claim it might have led him to invent jazz. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1430337.stm
However, I see a problem with this viewpoint… Trying to correlate creativity and mental illness seems to be a very simplistic.
A) Mental illness can strike anyone. The likelihood of a person encountering mental health issues during their lifetime is 1 in 4. Blame it on nature or nurture, it is basically random. Any age, any gender, any class, any profession. There are creative geniuses that have done amazing things, sane and insane. I expect the 1 to 4 ratio still applies here.
B) It is very easy to stereotype both creatives and the mentally ill as being a bit ‘whacky’, and therefore being ‘kinda’ the same thing, but its really not that simple.
I work in a creative setting, even though my illness gets in the way, my natural creativity still manages to shine through now and then. Some people have tried to argue that mental illness somehow makes you more creative - I believe that is completely false! In my opinion, the horse pulls the cart, not the other way round.
Those individuals who are mentally ill and yet still manage to overcome their problems and create amazing work should be revered for that fact alone, and not remembered for being unwell.
Buddy Bolden has become one of these people. Like John Nash, Van Gogh, he shouldn’t be remembered for being mentally ill. First and foremost, he should be remembered for being a great musician. Do we remember Barry White because he had diabetes? No. So I ask you, why is mental health any different?
I’d like to hear your views / theories as I have had nothing but opposition on other forums!