The New Yorker came out with an article about researching for psychology on humans, I came out to them, What are the standards you are using, are you putting practical treatments in to play, or extreme measures, are the humans getting payment ( compensation) for the findings, are the doctors giving the findings to the patient, or is this a closed book on what is known, is this an ethical study that has been determined by an outside body, and something that needs to be done, or is this use and folly?
2 Likes
you know what they told me? Nothing!
No response at all. I guess they figured it was a clean study.
If you want to research on humans, you better have good reasons, and give it up to never being up to science, but the human factor.
2 Likes
I’d imagine the New Yorker gets so much correspondence they just can’t reply to it all. I’d rather they research on humans. Save the animals! 
1 Like
Was there something about this research study that seemed immoral? Most research in the social sciences is done on humans.
2 Likes
I can’t remember all the article said that they did to these in studying their brains
but my antennas went up
idk, thanks for not locking.
Just a memory I wanted to share
1 Like
This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.