Right, so there was some research there for computerized CBT, though. Does giving computerized CBT improve auditory hallucinations?
I can’t follow what someone is saying unless they are speaking the Queen’s English. If there are any strong accents or colloquialisms I can’t understand what they’re saying. My ability to understand speech seems to be very fragile.
I’m pretty sane for a person who hears voices. I don’t seem to experience the problems most articles talk about, like difficulty with metaphors and stuff. Then again I studied metaphor extensively in college, as I was an English major.
Any human condition (regardless of its name) has the basic characteristics of the things that you call it a hallucination,it is considered the condition which be known by the name "schizophrenia ",that is true even if there is inability to diagnose any of its famous symptoms
The things be called Hallucinations,is the Only Expression of the new condition that the person suffers from And there is an inability to diagnosing them by the observations of the external viewers ,While all symptoms that can be diagnosed is just an Personal impressions for the external observers and be taken as a signs to determine the existence of SZ or not in the diagnosed sample -no more
All types of symptoms are the bad side effects that arise from the functional activity of the hallucinations on any higher knowledge processes running in the conscious state of the person during the waking time
The schizophrenia is just a name ,while the hallucinations is the actual body and the effective material ,therefore there is no any single person in our universe suffers from schizophrenia while he does not experience the hallucinations ,like there is no a sea without water
In this report ,They said;
Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs)
29 sz patients with (AVHs)
27 patients with sz who had never experience HVHs
57 healthy controls were required to imagine hearing a voice in one ear alone
the questions;
Where from do you know that the 29 sz patients experience the AVHs / not ?
How do you know the 27 patients do not experience the AVHs ?
Just you depend on Belief the sayings of the samples as they come !
In both cases,there is no any scientific method to diagnosing the auditory verbal hallucinations,which it means that you do not know what is the phenomenon that you try to examine it
you are searching an acoustic material that you do not hearing them
Frankly,There is an intention (previously prepared) to non- recognition with the hallucinations by replacing them with another phenomenon ( imagine a voices )
Insist on searching about any anatomical phenomenon for sake taken it a model instead of the hallucination to explains the causes of hearing voices ,even if it is necessary rely on irrelevant data
explanation the realities of percetual vocal thoughts ( supernatural phenomenon ) as it is an audible imaginations to a voices ( merely a physical phenomenon)
And the person who is experiences the phonetic thoughts ,is just a person that he imagines he listens to a voices ,this is the unreal brief of the theory
The question;
what is the purpose of designing experiments based on false data ?