They significantly changed the definition of schizophrenia regarding qualifying components.
It used to be out of 7 or so major features you’d have to have at least 4 for a legitimate diagnosis.
I went through having the drug-induced psychosis label and it was probably 6 months after confirmed sobriety that they gave me the stronger diagnostic label.
The blurry line that determines what is a psychotic feature, is that it is persistent in the individual beyond subjugation to things that have been shown to alleviate neurosis. Where neurosis all has strong voluntary components that can be more easily alleviated and undercut by therapy and medication. Elements of psychosis lack that voluntary component in any perceivable way.
Psychosis is not an indicator of schizophrenia alone. Which is why I liked the older model for determining the diagnosis.
I believe schizophrenia is more or less a generic label for having a disease with psychotic features, including persistent delusions, that renders an individual dysfunctional and incapable of taking care of oneself. Or more along those lines. The case to case evaluation is subjective to a very fractured field of differing levels of interest and professional opinion.
Basically though, the hall mark sign of being dysfunctional is when an individual can longer foreseeably maintain gainful employment due to their illness. Prolonged medical evaluation has enough documentation for the state to accept an individual as “disabled” or incapable of being financially independent.
There is a wide range of factors there… Which is why it’s important to look past the illness, beyond accepting that you have atypical issues to a degree that jeopardize your capacity to maintain standard expectations. I mean it’s important to not stand in denial that your mental experience is significantly different than the expectation, but beyond that… You should treat your mental illness as the collective set of your symptoms. Each one detailed…
Breaking it down can make it a lot easier to determine how to cope or even overcome the added struggles in life.
Leave it to your doctors to determine a professional evaluation… and if you don’t think a particular doctor is getting right… seek secondary opinions. Psychiatrists deal with a wide range of very complex and poorly understood disorders, and because of this their opinions shouldn’t be considered 100% accurate.
I’ve met a share of them… half of the time the person writing the prescription was nothing more than nurse practitioner. Not an official psychiatrist that is capable of operating on their own.
So things to consider there.
It’s more important to never forget that you have a strong amount of mental frailty and it’s important to shape the course of your future to best respect that… because it’s only then that life can seem strongly stable enough to trust… At that point it’s a lot easier to get a sense of comfort with the illness being there and let of the tragedy of the unique challenges life dropped on you all at once.
I’m assuming your delusions have passed and that you have more residual frustrations and confusions with the experience…
Based on the duration of your symptoms it should be a sign to most professionals that you had a psychotic “first break” that should stand legitimately out against cases of drug-induced… short term psychosis.
However I’m not a professional, but I hope all of that helps. It’s about all the perspective I have on the matter.