If you were able to know technically what the nature of the Factor responsible for creation of the condition or its symptoms outputs (existentially /functionally),you will completely distract consideration from adhering to the unreal hypothesis that claims THAT AN INTERACTION OF GENETIC FACTORS with another environmental cause the condition or its diagnostic symptoms
Just you adhere to a fragile hypothesis because you do not know (theoretically or practically) who is the real cause of the condition ,whether its the cause of existence ,the functional cause,the mechanism of effect,the moods of change that the effect creates
so,what the schizophrenia is in its basic nature without talking about its symptoms,characterized by A,B and C or treatment methods ?
Do not ignore that,you do not know any true thing about the essential nature of the condition itself except its symptoms outputs that are noticed by the eye-experiences of the observers,and you claim what you say based on these diagnostic visions -nothing else
What of the occasional gross abnormalities or the fact that sz brains had more dopamine when they did tests obviously post mortum. Also. Why do dopamine agonists/ partial agonists works so well for some people. I still don’t know what you are trying to prove. It’s a real disorder and yeah we are in the ballpark but the cheap seats.
I think you’re wrong there, we do know that a lot of Sz patients respond well to meds and a few to psychotherapy. To say that we don’t know the cause means little, all that matters is what can be done to reduce symptoms. You keep equating lack of knowedge of the cause to our treatments not working. I think knowledge of specific causes to be irrelevant, even if we stumble upon a cure by accident it will still work even if we don’t know the specific mechanism.