Who will join me in a philosophy conversation?
No need for big questions, we can stick to the normal day to day social constructs.
You pick any subject. We can have a normal conversation about it and see different point of views
Who will join me in a philosophy conversation?
No need for big questions, we can stick to the normal day to day social constructs.
You pick any subject. We can have a normal conversation about it and see different point of views
I start
I read somewhere this anectod
âitâs easy to seduce a women, itâs hard to find one worth seducingâ.
It really speaks to me, all my life I havenât met one worthy of my attention. Its actually a fear of mine that there will never be a girl who will be worth it for me, I canât do what people do in movies and just seduce girls without feeling a connection.
I canât win a girl with my rational thinking, I need to feel something for her to move forward. And right now I am apathic for one year.
Iâm game. The so-called anecdote, in all its dubious sexist glory, makes the assumption that women which are easy to seduce arenât worth seducing. Why? If the seduction itself is the goal, regarded as something like a sport, then that would make a great deal of sense. If the idea is to measure up the desirability of a woman by how much âresistanceâ the offer then the criteria is ludicrous.
I suggest you read it again and try to comprehend what itâs saying then wrote another comment wich will not be passive aggressive and based on a misunderstanding in the anectod
There was no aggression in my comment. The first thing you do in âphilosophyâ is to clarify terms and the intentions of the author. If you believe my reading is wrong explain why. At any rate, both propositions, âitâs easy to seduce a womanâ, and âitâs hard to find one worth seducingâ are unequivocally sexist. WOmen are not there to satisfy your high standards.
Youâre clearly out of it.
This thinking of yours is so brained washed feminist
You clearly donât understand the sentiment of wanting somebody but nobody is fit for you.
Itâs not about my narcissistic view of myself that puts me above every female.
This correlates very good with sz and mentall illness (the anectod) because you need to feel something for someone to give her a change meaning that most of women are not worth it your troubles because you donât feel a connection.
Itâs not about âOmG eVeRY WOmeN Is eQuAL So I donât need to choose because theyâre the sameâ
Itâs about what fits you and your soul.
And donât tell me about sexism, are you a women or a men speaking for women rights?
Two are not equal btw,
Thanks for making clear that whilst I might be a brain-washed feminist, you, on the other hand, couldnât be farther from being a sexist as I hysterically and womanishly pointed out. Pity the debate had to end the very moment its terms became clear. Have a nice day, and I mean that.
I didnât wanted to have a conversation with a passive aggressive dod like you anyway
Not passive aggresive, youâre just not very philosophically minded. By the way, what is a âdodâ? It sure doesnât sound good
Dude, dood etcetc etc
gotcha! thanks!
Do squirrels pee?
Start over? 2515151516
You got my attention
Letâs give it a try, but all of us have to be open to revising our own prejudices, I think
I thought you accused me of sexism. So I took that as a accusation based on one anectod wich is not even mine.
Not the âso-called Crocodalâ
I care about the text, not the person. And itâs not an anecdote, itâs just a poor attempt at making a witticism.
I am not fluent in English I donât know the term, I guess itâs a saying. (Sorry for my English)
And I donât think the author tries to be witty, I understand the saying, itâs based on real problems some people face in forming relationships
Itâs really speak with me after being medicated.
You see, we want relationships (we as human) but after apathy or plain feeling makes you blunt to any external feelings when you meet a person who makes you feel those wonderful feeling again It means that person is special and worth pursuing.
You can want relationships without feeling something for x person, and thereâs Manny reasons money, social status, lonylees, etc.
But the true motivation in wining a person heart is when you do it with your soul
They must. But I have never seen it happen. So I am unsure.