@Montezuma yeah a great book and movie. Both classics but their differences really do make them unique. I love the book. It’s musings on the religious journey of Decker make it such a wow of a read. The differences in the movie are striking but it really is a good movie as well. Classic Sci Fi and really well done.
You have some good taste sir! My pic would be Hearts of Darkness and Apocolypse Now. Truly inspired bit of movie making to take it out of the darkness of Africa to the Jungles of Vietnam. It too is remarkable for it’s differences but the works both stand up on their own and are classics in their genre!
I didn’t even think of Apocalypse Now ! Another great example!
Conrad’s book is a classic, as is Coppola’s film. Did you ever see the documentary behind the making of Apocalypse Now? I think it’s titled Heart of Darkness. It’s also a great flick!
I really don’t read enough books to answer this topic. I mostly read Stephen King, and the tv/movie adaptations seem like they don’t vary much from the books.
Yes, another good example. I forgot who wrote the books. But I recall the books being written quite some time ago, long before they adapted them into movies.
I think they had to update some of the new technology for the movies.